<?xml version="1.0" standalone="yes"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="css/rss.xslt"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"><channel><title>中国商标异议网-老爷车LAOYECHE及图商标异议案评析</title><link>http://www.chitm.com/post/174.html</link><generator>RainbowSoft Studio Z-Blog 1.8 Spirit Build 80722</generator><language>zh-CN</language><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 09:02:50 +0800</pubDate><item><title>Re:老爷车LAOYECHE及图商标异议案评析</title><author> (兰花草)</author><link>http://www.chitm.com/post/174.html#cmt11</link><pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 10:59:33 +0800</pubDate><guid>http://www.chitm.com/post/174.html#cmt11</guid><description><![CDATA[是啊，很不一样，再说也没有证据。看来商标局对提交上去的大量证据也是做审查的啊，不是吃干饭的。以为他们不看呢，那我得好好写异议了。唉！]]></description></item></channel></rss>
